Science, Truth and Democracy

Noted philosopher of science Philip Kitcher examines the intense debate about the role that science plays in shaping our lives. He examines in particular the sharp divide that separates purists who believe that the pursuit of scientific knowledge is always valuable and necessary, on the one hand, from others who believe that it invariably serves the interest of those in positions of power, on the other. He rejects both perspectives and works out a more realistic image of the sciences -- one that allows for the possibility of scientific truth, but nonetheless permits social consensus to determine which avenues to investigate. He then proposes a democratic and deliberative framework for responsible scientists to follow. Kitcher's nuanced yet controversial analysis and conclusion will be of interest to a wide range of readers interested in the sciences.